what I condemned was violence based in bigotry and intolerance- BOTH SIDES!

Current Events » in reply to He did the same thing for Van Gogh.

R.L. — 11/17/2004 12:54:29 AM (archived)

What got me pissed off then was the same thing that pissed me off then- some people applauding actions of some people that they at the same time consider heinous atrocities when the other side does it...

When it is 'my side' doing the atrocities I get VERY worried.

The fact that you cant get that through your thick skull shows what a small shallow creature you are...

The whole thread (25 posts)

Usually if there is a graphic video of an atrocity in Iraq you can count on Tom to post a link to it- oddly not this time - R.L. - 11/16/2004 9:46:11 PM
- Davin posted a reference to the video earlier. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/16/2004 10:38:19 PM
- I note that you feel sorry for the dead terrorist, but express no sympathy with the murdered CARE worker. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 11/16/2004 9:58:47 PM
  - So in fact you now admit insurgents are also terrorists. Thus Bush's pointless war has breed terrorists. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 11/17/2004 12:57:48 AM
    - So in fact you now admit insurgents are also terrorists. The Saddam Hussein government was ruled by terror. Fanatical Islam is ruled by terror. "Admit" is hardly the word to use. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 11/17/2004 7:16:55 AM
    - No, Most Rational People Have Called Them Terrorists All Along - Mark Eby - 11/17/2004 4:20:38 AM
  - He did the same thing for Van Gogh. - Lee - 11/17/2004 12:31:43 AM
    - what I condemned was violence based in bigotry and intolerance- BOTH SIDES! - R.L. - 11/17/2004 12:54:29 AM
      - The Islamists started this conflict. - Lee - 11/17/2004 1:02:52 AM
        
        People like you on their side are the problem- You have the same mindset as those supporting the terrorists - R.L. - 11/17/2004 1:15:08 AM
  - Inaccurate - Tom Brosz - 11/16/2004 10:42:09 PM
  - You have that completely wrong, intentionally so I believe- all you slandering me as a lover of terrorists better read this REAL damn carefully - R.L. - 11/16/2004 10:11:40 PM
    - Then put it in context and sack up. - ebnelson - 11/16/2004 10:18:30 PM
      - So when our wounded were killed by the insurgents and hung from a bridge that was ok with you? - R.L. - 11/16/2004 10:32:54 PM
        
        No, I support our troops and my fellow citizens. I thought you could tell the difference. Oh well. - ebnelson - 11/16/2004 10:56:12 PM
        
        An atrocity is an atrocity, and ethics are ethics- you apparently change your ethics rather than actually think... (n/t) - R.L. - 11/16/2004 11:10:31 PM
        
        No, you react like just another sheep. You have no way to know that an atrocity ahs been committed in that video. - ebnelson - 11/17/2004 3:37:01 PM
        
        He was unarmed, wounded, unmoving, laying on the floor- WHAT THE HELL DO YOU CALL THAT???! - R.L. - 11/17/2004 6:45:52 PM
        
        I condemned Abu Ghraib, and in the video I saw, the guy was moving, which was why he was shot. - ebnelson - 11/17/2004 9:44:51 PM
        
        To hell with having an investigation or trial. I guess we should just hang that Marine right now. - Larry J - 11/17/2004 8:23:03 PM
        
        A couple of minor differences - FrankC - 11/16/2004 10:49:20 PM
        
        2. The Marine that committed this offense faces hard times that I doubt the murderers and desecrators of coalition casualties face. (ARE YOU KIDDING ME?! FROM THE REPORTS MANY HUNDREDS HAVE ALREADY G… (n/t) - r.l. - 11/16/2004 11:00:19 PM
        
        Surely you realize I meant from his own side. - FrankC - 11/16/2004 11:09:30 PM
        
        You mean the Iraqi police havent been part of this operation? (n/t) - R.L. - 11/16/2004 11:11:48 PM
        
        Several here have made light of the shooting, - R.L. - 11/16/2004 10:58:49 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (25 posts)