Flame » in reply to Why have a Flame board?

The whole thread (25 posts)

• Why have a Flame board? - Todd - 11/17/2004 7:02:22 AM
  • So we can swear without gettin' spanked. (n/t) - RobVG - 11/18/2004 2:56:11 AM
  • Gotta have a woodshed. Or an ally out back. (n/t) - alcaray - 11/17/2004 11:43:04 PM
    • An ally out back waiting in the alley, maybe. (n/t) - alcaray - 11/18/2004 4:05:13 PM
      • Strength in numbers :-) (n/t) - Tony - 11/19/2004 7:24:04 PM
  • Hmmm - FrankC - 11/17/2004 11:26:30 PM
    • LOL and your post to me in the thread below is... what? - R.L. - 11/18/2004 6:54:47 AM
      • my post was a deliberate insult directed at you - FrankC - 11/19/2004 12:36:03 AM
        • Not sure what set you off frank... rest assured, your opinion of me will keep me up nights- lol - R.L. - 11/19/2004 4:44:04 AM
          • Well, there is such a thing as having a bad day and there is having a bad life - FrankC - 11/19/2004 8:00:24 AM
            • By the looks of your album pic, you're having the latter... (n/t) - R.L. - 11/19/2004 7:53:40 PM
              • I'm an old fart what's your excuse? (n/t) - FrankC - 11/19/2004 9:00:36 PM
                • :) I need one? (n/t) - R.L. - 11/20/2004 1:49:12 AM
            • And there is such a thing as being fair. - Pliney the younger - 11/19/2004 4:02:34 PM
              • Obviously pea number 2. - RobVG - 11/20/2004 2:43:14 AM
                • Of sorts, I suppose - ~lax teach - 11/21/2004 5:09:19 AM
                  • OK, "Mr. incognito"... - RobVG - 11/22/2004 1:26:08 AM
                    • About facts - .L. - 11/22/2004 3:42:49 AM
                      • Wireless key boards have problems- That was 'R.L.' (n/t) - R.L. - 11/22/2004 3:56:55 AM
                    • A short tutorial for the IP address reading impaired - R.L. - 11/22/2004 3:18:41 AM
                      • re: A short tutorial for the reading impaired - RobVG - 11/22/2004 4:08:22 AM
                  • Hmm... (n/t) - RobVG - 11/22/2004 12:20:48 AM
      • You see, Frank is so stressed out from scrabbling to claim the moral highground of non-partisan 'impartiality' for himself - Davin L. - 11/18/2004 5:17:33 PM
    • Well... - Todd - 11/18/2004 3:57:09 AM
      • so true - FrankC - 11/18/2004 6:38:47 AM