"Some of the time we get to see the human side of R.L. -when he shares his work or tries out one of his awful puns. Most of the time it's the "Mr. Hyde" side we see. A more calm and reasoned approach to combating pseudo science would be something of interest."
I'm not interested in defending R.L.- Not because I don't think he is defensible (he is), but because any defense would fall flat given the source, and he's a big boy who tends to take care of himself in a battle of wits.
What I was posting about if how Frank is a hypocrite and a floppy-eared ruminating hoofed beast with bad temperment, aka an ass.
As far as Frank being a 'Stud Bolt', I point out his accusation of terrorism, I reiterate his blatant hypocritical double standard (which I notice you did not even touch in his defense), and I say again that his attempt at insult and 'flame' simply demonstrates massive delusional self-desception. Again, none of which you negated.
If Frank is a stud bolt of this community, then may Robert drop that 50 pound magnent with all due haste.
again, prior context will lend me to a pseudonym... but you can just call me the Black Knight, Tommy Boy. See you down by the river.
Flame » in reply to Obviously pea number 2.
Of sorts, I suppose
The whole thread (25 posts)
- Why have a Flame board?
- So we can swear without gettin' spanked. (n/t)
- Gotta have a woodshed. Or an ally out back. (n/t)
- Hmmm
- LOL and your post to me in the thread below is... what?
- my post was a deliberate insult directed at you
- Not sure what set you off frank... rest assured, your opinion of me will keep me up nights- lol
- You see, Frank is so stressed out from scrabbling to claim the moral highground of non-partisan 'impartiality' for himself
- my post was a deliberate insult directed at you
- Well...
- LOL and your post to me in the thread below is... what?
