Space/Science » in reply to You included simulations, not data

The whole thread (43 posts)

• GLOBAL WARMING- ONE MORE TIME FOR GBAIKIE AND MAYER- would somebody bookmark this? - R.L. (exasperated) - 11/17/2004 9:48:05 PM
  • what I never understand about this argument - Greg - 11/20/2004 10:22:12 AM
  • They won't, because your numbers are bogus - E.P. Grondine - 11/19/2004 5:32:08 PM
    • I included temp data for the past couple of hundred thousand years... - R.L. - 11/19/2004 7:47:28 PM
      • You included simulations, not data - E.P. Grondine - 11/19/2004 11:49:37 PM
        • I specifically said it was Ice core data... NOT simulation - R.L. - 11/20/2004 4:32:00 AM
          • Yeah, a citation for the blue chart would be nice (n/t) - E.P. Grondine - 11/20/2004 5:35:04 PM
  • re: GLOBAL WARMING- ONE MORE TIME FOR GBAIKIE AND MAYER- would somebody bookmark this? - Johannes - 11/18/2004 6:10:58 PM
  • re: GLOBAL WARMING- ONE MORE TIME FOR GBAIKIE AND MAYER- would somebody bookmark this? - Arthur Smith - 11/18/2004 3:53:40 PM
    • Hey Arthur... - Adam Crowl - 11/19/2004 12:02:22 PM
      • military applications - Arthur Smith - 11/19/2004 7:12:37 PM
  • ONE MORE TIME FOR R.L , ET, Alcaray & THE REST.... - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/18/2004 3:12:47 AM
    • quote from your link: - alcaray - 11/18/2004 3:56:15 PM
      • & another quote, this one from the 2004 link: - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/18/2004 10:49:05 PM
        • You don't see the humor in posting a link that supports your opponents? (n/t) - alcaray - 11/18/2004 11:12:42 PM
          • 1997 is like ancient history in science terms. I used it intentionally. ;-) (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/19/2004 2:06:52 AM
            • All part of your fiendish plan, Dr. No? (n/t) - alcaray - 11/19/2004 6:49:18 PM
    • BUZZZ WRONG AGAIN, THANKS FOR PLAYING - R.L. - 11/18/2004 4:02:16 AM
      • Spit is starting to fly, buddy. Getting hard to understand you. (n/t) - alcaray - 11/18/2004 3:57:10 PM
        • The caps were an accident, not added for emphasis (n/t) - R.L. - 11/19/2004 8:38:47 PM
      • DING DING DING WENT THE TROLLEY! - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/18/2004 4:15:23 AM
  • Doesn't affect next quarter's profits, so who cares? (n/t) - alcaray - 11/17/2004 10:22:33 PM
  • re: GLOBAL WARMING- ONE MORE TIME FOR GBAIKIE AND MAYER- would somebody bookmark this? - LJ - 11/17/2004 10:17:16 PM
    • Sea Levels - SteveS - 11/18/2004 4:39:55 PM
      • re: Sea Levels - LJ - 11/18/2004 6:13:59 PM
        • re: That sounds like it could be an insect problem... Plus a P.S. question for geology majors. - Scott Evil - 11/18/2004 8:12:13 PM
          • Plate tectonics plays a role in sea-level rise/fall on a local and global scale. - jms - 11/18/2004 11:27:09 PM
            • Isostatic Rebound and relative sea level. - jms - 11/19/2004 2:33:10 AM
              • Isostatic Rebound also plays a role in spacecraft orbital mechanics - Gary - 11/20/2004 5:56:27 AM
                • Ice sheets are cool. - jms - 11/20/2004 9:00:39 PM
                  • Geoid modeling - Gary - 11/21/2004 2:08:57 AM
              • "Post Glacial Rebound" - SteveS - 11/20/2004 2:24:44 AM
                • ..oops... - jms - 11/20/2004 3:34:41 AM
                  • Well, Isostatic Rebound sounds more scientific ;-) (n/t) - SteveS - 11/20/2004 1:13:21 PM
                    • Eustatic would be more scientific as well. - jms - 11/20/2004 8:58:10 PM
              • re: Thanks for the info...the type of uplift/rebound as seen in Greenland was what I was thinking of... - Scott Evil - 11/19/2004 2:36:40 PM
          • Non-geology major reply - SteveS - 11/18/2004 11:00:53 PM
  • AND SCOTT - check. - stubborn idiET - 11/17/2004 10:06:42 PM
    • The modeling just confirmed with higher accuracy what was already known - R.L. - 11/18/2004 12:33:17 AM
      • it's nothing that steely resolve and tax cuts won't fix (n/t) - Greg - 11/18/2004 2:30:04 AM
        • Come again? - et - 11/18/2004 4:17:12 AM
          • That seems to be the Republican solution to all problems, why not global warming? (n/t) - Greg - 11/18/2004 4:23:49 AM
            • Ban SUVs! Allow each person 100watts of electricity a day! - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/18/2004 4:29:20 AM