quote from your link:

Space/Science » in reply to ONE MORE TIME FOR R.L , ET, Alcaray & THE REST....

quote from your link:

alcaray — 11/18/2004 3:56:15 PM (archived)

"Dr. Willson said most researchers expected greenhouse gases to warm the planet by 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit over the next 100 years. Solar irradiance could add another 0.72 degrees, he said."

The whole thread (43 posts)

GLOBAL WARMING- ONE MORE TIME FOR GBAIKIE AND MAYER- would somebody bookmark this? - R.L. (exasperated) - 11/17/2004 9:48:05 PM
- what I never understand about this argument - Greg - 11/20/2004 10:22:12 AM
- They won't, because your numbers are bogus - E.P. Grondine - 11/19/2004 5:32:08 PM
  - I included temp data for the past couple of hundred thousand years... - R.L. - 11/19/2004 7:47:28 PM
    - You included simulations, not data - E.P. Grondine - 11/19/2004 11:49:37 PM
      - I specifically said it was Ice core data... NOT simulation - R.L. - 11/20/2004 4:32:00 AM
        
        Yeah, a citation for the blue chart would be nice (n/t) - E.P. Grondine - 11/20/2004 5:35:04 PM
- re: GLOBAL WARMING- ONE MORE TIME FOR GBAIKIE AND MAYER- would somebody bookmark this? - Johannes - 11/18/2004 6:10:58 PM
- re: GLOBAL WARMING- ONE MORE TIME FOR GBAIKIE AND MAYER- would somebody bookmark this? - Arthur Smith - 11/18/2004 3:53:40 PM
  - Hey Arthur... - Adam Crowl - 11/19/2004 12:02:22 PM
    - military applications - Arthur Smith - 11/19/2004 7:12:37 PM
- ONE MORE TIME FOR R.L , ET, Alcaray & THE REST.... - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/18/2004 3:12:47 AM
  - quote from your link: - alcaray - 11/18/2004 3:56:15 PM
    - & another quote, this one from the 2004 link: - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/18/2004 10:49:05 PM
      - You don't see the humor in posting a link that supports your opponents? (n/t) - alcaray - 11/18/2004 11:12:42 PM
        
        1997 is like ancient history in science terms. I used it intentionally. ;-) (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/19/2004 2:06:52 AM
        
        All part of your fiendish plan, Dr. No? (n/t) - alcaray - 11/19/2004 6:49:18 PM
  - BUZZZ WRONG AGAIN, THANKS FOR PLAYING - R.L. - 11/18/2004 4:02:16 AM
    - Spit is starting to fly, buddy. Getting hard to understand you. (n/t) - alcaray - 11/18/2004 3:57:10 PM
      - The caps were an accident, not added for emphasis (n/t) - R.L. - 11/19/2004 8:38:47 PM
    - DING DING DING WENT THE TROLLEY! - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/18/2004 4:15:23 AM
- Doesn't affect next quarter's profits, so who cares? (n/t) - alcaray - 11/17/2004 10:22:33 PM
- re: GLOBAL WARMING- ONE MORE TIME FOR GBAIKIE AND MAYER- would somebody bookmark this? - LJ - 11/17/2004 10:17:16 PM
  - Sea Levels - SteveS - 11/18/2004 4:39:55 PM
    - re: Sea Levels - LJ - 11/18/2004 6:13:59 PM
      - re: That sounds like it could be an insect problem... Plus a P.S. question for geology majors. - Scott Evil - 11/18/2004 8:12:13 PM
        
        Plate tectonics plays a role in sea-level rise/fall on a local and global scale. - jms - 11/18/2004 11:27:09 PM
        
        Isostatic Rebound and relative sea level. - jms - 11/19/2004 2:33:10 AM
        
        Isostatic Rebound also plays a role in spacecraft orbital mechanics - Gary - 11/20/2004 5:56:27 AM
        
        Ice sheets are cool. - jms - 11/20/2004 9:00:39 PM
        
        Geoid modeling - Gary - 11/21/2004 2:08:57 AM
        
        "Post Glacial Rebound" - SteveS - 11/20/2004 2:24:44 AM
        
        ..oops... - jms - 11/20/2004 3:34:41 AM
        
        Well, Isostatic Rebound sounds more scientific ;-) (n/t) - SteveS - 11/20/2004 1:13:21 PM
        
        Eustatic would be more scientific as well. - jms - 11/20/2004 8:58:10 PM
        
        re: Thanks for the info...the type of uplift/rebound as seen in Greenland was what I was thinking of... - Scott Evil - 11/19/2004 2:36:40 PM
        
        Non-geology major reply - SteveS - 11/18/2004 11:00:53 PM
- AND SCOTT - check. - stubborn idiET - 11/17/2004 10:06:42 PM
  - The modeling just confirmed with higher accuracy what was already known - R.L. - 11/18/2004 12:33:17 AM
    - it's nothing that steely resolve and tax cuts won't fix (n/t) - Greg - 11/18/2004 2:30:04 AM
      - Come again? - et - 11/18/2004 4:17:12 AM
        
        That seems to be the Republican solution to all problems, why not global warming? (n/t) - Greg - 11/18/2004 4:23:49 AM
        
        Ban SUVs! Allow each person 100watts of electricity a day! - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/18/2004 4:29:20 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (43 posts)