BUZZZ WRONG AGAIN, THANKS FOR PLAYING

Space/Science » in reply to ONE MORE TIME FOR R.L , ET, Alcaray & THE REST....

BUZZZ WRONG AGAIN, THANKS FOR PLAYING

R.L. — 11/18/2004 4:02:16 AM (archived)

THE THREAD ON CE TOUCHED ON THAT- THE UPSHOT IS THE CHANGE IN SOLAR OUTPUT IS _NOT_ SUFFICIENT TO EXPLAIN THE WARMING- I CAN PRODUCE THE NASA STUDIES IF YOU LIKE, O MIGHT VORTEX LOON.....

The whole thread (43 posts)

GLOBAL WARMING- ONE MORE TIME FOR GBAIKIE AND MAYER- would somebody bookmark this? - R.L. (exasperated) - 11/17/2004 9:48:05 PM
- what I never understand about this argument - Greg - 11/20/2004 10:22:12 AM
- They won't, because your numbers are bogus - E.P. Grondine - 11/19/2004 5:32:08 PM
  - I included temp data for the past couple of hundred thousand years... - R.L. - 11/19/2004 7:47:28 PM
    - You included simulations, not data - E.P. Grondine - 11/19/2004 11:49:37 PM
      - I specifically said it was Ice core data... NOT simulation - R.L. - 11/20/2004 4:32:00 AM
        
        Yeah, a citation for the blue chart would be nice (n/t) - E.P. Grondine - 11/20/2004 5:35:04 PM
- re: GLOBAL WARMING- ONE MORE TIME FOR GBAIKIE AND MAYER- would somebody bookmark this? - Johannes - 11/18/2004 6:10:58 PM
- re: GLOBAL WARMING- ONE MORE TIME FOR GBAIKIE AND MAYER- would somebody bookmark this? - Arthur Smith - 11/18/2004 3:53:40 PM
  - Hey Arthur... - Adam Crowl - 11/19/2004 12:02:22 PM
    - military applications - Arthur Smith - 11/19/2004 7:12:37 PM
- ONE MORE TIME FOR R.L , ET, Alcaray & THE REST.... - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/18/2004 3:12:47 AM
  - quote from your link: - alcaray - 11/18/2004 3:56:15 PM
    - & another quote, this one from the 2004 link: - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/18/2004 10:49:05 PM
      - You don't see the humor in posting a link that supports your opponents? (n/t) - alcaray - 11/18/2004 11:12:42 PM
        
        1997 is like ancient history in science terms. I used it intentionally. ;-) (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/19/2004 2:06:52 AM
        
        All part of your fiendish plan, Dr. No? (n/t) - alcaray - 11/19/2004 6:49:18 PM
  - BUZZZ WRONG AGAIN, THANKS FOR PLAYING - R.L. - 11/18/2004 4:02:16 AM
    - Spit is starting to fly, buddy. Getting hard to understand you. (n/t) - alcaray - 11/18/2004 3:57:10 PM
      - The caps were an accident, not added for emphasis (n/t) - R.L. - 11/19/2004 8:38:47 PM
    - DING DING DING WENT THE TROLLEY! - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/18/2004 4:15:23 AM
- Doesn't affect next quarter's profits, so who cares? (n/t) - alcaray - 11/17/2004 10:22:33 PM
- re: GLOBAL WARMING- ONE MORE TIME FOR GBAIKIE AND MAYER- would somebody bookmark this? - LJ - 11/17/2004 10:17:16 PM
  - Sea Levels - SteveS - 11/18/2004 4:39:55 PM
    - re: Sea Levels - LJ - 11/18/2004 6:13:59 PM
      - re: That sounds like it could be an insect problem... Plus a P.S. question for geology majors. - Scott Evil - 11/18/2004 8:12:13 PM
        
        Plate tectonics plays a role in sea-level rise/fall on a local and global scale. - jms - 11/18/2004 11:27:09 PM
        
        Isostatic Rebound and relative sea level. - jms - 11/19/2004 2:33:10 AM
        
        Isostatic Rebound also plays a role in spacecraft orbital mechanics - Gary - 11/20/2004 5:56:27 AM
        
        Ice sheets are cool. - jms - 11/20/2004 9:00:39 PM
        
        Geoid modeling - Gary - 11/21/2004 2:08:57 AM
        
        "Post Glacial Rebound" - SteveS - 11/20/2004 2:24:44 AM
        
        ..oops... - jms - 11/20/2004 3:34:41 AM
        
        Well, Isostatic Rebound sounds more scientific ;-) (n/t) - SteveS - 11/20/2004 1:13:21 PM
        
        Eustatic would be more scientific as well. - jms - 11/20/2004 8:58:10 PM
        
        re: Thanks for the info...the type of uplift/rebound as seen in Greenland was what I was thinking of... - Scott Evil - 11/19/2004 2:36:40 PM
        
        Non-geology major reply - SteveS - 11/18/2004 11:00:53 PM
- AND SCOTT - check. - stubborn idiET - 11/17/2004 10:06:42 PM
  - The modeling just confirmed with higher accuracy what was already known - R.L. - 11/18/2004 12:33:17 AM
    - it's nothing that steely resolve and tax cuts won't fix (n/t) - Greg - 11/18/2004 2:30:04 AM
      - Come again? - et - 11/18/2004 4:17:12 AM
        
        That seems to be the Republican solution to all problems, why not global warming? (n/t) - Greg - 11/18/2004 4:23:49 AM
        
        Ban SUVs! Allow each person 100watts of electricity a day! - SDAI-Tech1 - 11/18/2004 4:29:20 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (43 posts)