This had better not be referring to my post, Robert -
.. because as I clearly stated:
NOTE: I AM NOT SAYING THIS FORM OF MIND CONTROL IS BEING PRACTICED. I AM SAYING ONLY THAT THE BASIC SCIENCE IS VALID, AND THE TECHNOLOGY NOW EXISTS FOR POSSIBLE AUTOSUGGESTION. I AM NOT SAYING THAT IT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING, HOWEVER. I AM SAYING HOWEVER, THAT 'MIND CONROL' CLAIMS HAVE TO BE DEALT SERIOUSLY WITH ON A POLITICAL AND SOCIAL CRITICAL BASIS, AND NOT ON A SCIENTIFIC BASIS, SINCE THE BASIC SCIENCE IS VALID. THE HZ KNEE-JERK REACTIONS WERE WRONG, WRONG, WRONG.
And, even if your post was not in reference to mine, I would still like to know whether you are prepared to distinguish between the basic science, which is valid, and the paranoid conspiracy claims being made about its usage.
In other words: are you prepared to acknowledge you were wrong to dismiss the basic science as pseudoscience? That's all I want to know - I want to know the degree of self-honesty, both professional and personal, of the scientists and engineers here. Are you prepared to acknowledge a mistake, especially a scientific mistake?