Off Topic » in reply to JUDE LAW. Why didn't they cast Jude Law???

The whole thread (16 posts)

• Movie trailers - Tom Brosz - 12/14/2004 1:29:21 AM
  • Evidently this is the decade of the movie remakes. Few, if any, are even nearly as good as the originals. More proof that screenwriters are unimaginative dolts. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 12/19/2004 9:48:28 PM
    • I hear that every year, though. (n/t) - alcaray - 12/20/2004 11:36:54 PM
      • well, he did say decade. (n/t) - SDG - 12/21/2004 12:02:36 AM
    • On the whole, I agree, but I'm willing to give Peter Jackson's "King Kong" a fair shake. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 12/20/2004 2:01:43 AM
  • I'm surprised - FrankC - 12/16/2004 1:15:00 AM
  • Hmmmm - Tony - 12/15/2004 8:34:36 PM
  • It's gotta be better than George Pal's attempt - Fox - 12/15/2004 12:37:31 AM
    • Yeah - FrankC - 12/16/2004 12:40:23 AM
      • On the other hand... - Fox - 12/16/2004 4:44:20 AM
  • New "Constantine" trailer too... - Tom Brosz - 12/14/2004 1:40:49 AM
    • JUDE LAW. Why didn't they cast Jude Law??? - Mary Anne - 12/15/2004 12:17:48 AM
      • Because he's in every other movie as it is. Give the man some rest! ;-) (n/t) - Tony - 12/15/2004 1:49:47 PM
    • I'm afraid to ask..... - Tony - 12/14/2004 7:16:15 PM
      • Harry Potter grows up to be Sam Spade. - Mary Anne - 12/15/2004 12:45:06 AM
        • Too gory for my tastes. And a little comics news... - Tom Brosz - 12/15/2004 5:05:07 AM