However -
If I can demonstrate there is a military occupation of Iraq which is not responsible in any meaningful way to Iraqis, who can kill, torture, maim and destroy without Iraqis having any meaningful recourse,
AND
that the edicts of Bremer, the man who was installed as governor of Iraq through military force, cannot be changed by the Iraqis,
AND
that certain people and items cannot be on the ballot because they might well oppose the American military occupation described above, therefore depriving Iraqis of a meaningful choice,
will you agree the elections are a sham, meant only to install a puppet regime.
Arf (and the "democracy" question is for mayer, who touts both torture and "democracy")
Current Events » in reply to Elections in Iraq
Tom, I'm afraid you've lost "it".
The whole thread (16 posts)
- New, improved Abu Ghraib
- You don't understand. We must win a war against terrorists without stooping to violating anybody's rights, without hurting anyone, without taking any casualties. In other words, we must play the game… (n/t)
- The darkside
