Concur re: Unlikely

Space/Science » in reply to re: Unlikely

Concur re: Unlikely

JimO — 1/7/2005 2:43:20 PM (archived)

I agree with Raoul's points.

For an anti-satellite, a rocket merely has to carry a few kg of sand straight up, and disperse in its path. Accurately and well timed -- that's the difficulty.

The whole thread (13 posts)

The Iranian Safir-313 artificial satellite. March/2005. - Jacob Samorodin - 1/6/2005 8:06:23 PM
- Not getting specific... - Larry J - 1/6/2005 10:51:31 PM
- re: The Iranian Safir-313 artificial satellite. March/2005. - ebnelson - 1/6/2005 10:34:39 PM
  - re: The Iranian Safir-313 artificial satellite. March/2005. - TheSheepLookUp - 1/8/2005 4:55:58 PM
- re: The Iranian Safir-313 artificial satellite. March/2005. - dwc - 1/6/2005 10:18:07 PM
- A matter of perspective - TheSheepLookUp - 1/6/2005 9:21:43 PM
  - re: A matter of perspective - ebnelson - 1/7/2005 3:55:30 AM
    - re: A matter of perspective - TheSheepLookUp - 1/7/2005 8:13:39 PM
      - re: A matter of perspective - ebnelson - 1/8/2005 6:21:27 PM
        
        re: A matter of perspective - TheSheepLookUp - 1/10/2005 2:31:24 PM
  - Please look at a map. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 1/6/2005 11:38:42 PM
- re: Unlikely - Raoul - 1/6/2005 8:36:09 PM
  - Concur re: Unlikely - JimO - 1/7/2005 2:43:20 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (13 posts)