Current Events » in reply to No it isn't. It's not a hard, accurate number, but it's a reasonable estimate.

The whole thread (18 posts)

• 1,365 - Donald - 1/17/2005 4:34:35 PM
  • And how many have the terrorists lost so far? (n/t) - David F Mayer - 1/17/2005 5:25:02 PM
    • Tell me (n/t) - alcaray - 1/17/2005 7:06:33 PM
      • re: Tell me - Tom Brosz - 1/17/2005 7:41:07 PM
        • How many have been detained and have been determined to be enemy, rather than civilian? - David F Mayer - 1/17/2005 7:47:46 PM
          • Where do you get your secret knowledge of "Iraqi army prisons" from? - alcaray - 1/17/2005 9:30:48 PM
            • You don't want to know. You may think that you do, but you don't. - DFM - 1/17/2005 10:42:12 PM
              • Why would I not want to know something? You are such a drama king. - alcaray - 1/17/2005 11:34:43 PM
    • This isn't a sports scorecard - Donald - 1/17/2005 6:15:18 PM
      • P.S. The 100,000 number is still crap. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 1/17/2005 6:36:52 PM
        • No it isn't. It's not a hard, accurate number, but it's a reasonable estimate. (n/t) - LJ - 1/17/2005 9:12:17 PM
          • It is not even in the ball park - ebnelson - 1/19/2005 3:56:11 AM
            • Yes it is - LJ - 1/21/2005 2:37:41 AM
      • Yeah, what the hell do enemy losses have to do with how a war is going? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 1/17/2005 6:36:21 PM
        • Nothing. After all, the enemy has infinite resources, infinite money, infinite recruits, infinite power. We are fighting an invincible opponent. We might as well give up. [Or, rather, that is what th… - David F Mayer - 1/17/2005 10:54:27 PM
          • can't tell if you agree or disagree with Tom (n/t) - alcaray - 1/18/2005 7:14:15 PM
            • re: can't tell if you agree or disagree with Tom. Then READ what I wrote. You will find out what I mean. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 1/20/2005 6:10:02 PM
              • Tom was talking about whether counts of enemy losses meant anything - alcaray - 1/21/2005 3:30:34 AM