"looks like the same location to me."
It isn't. Just take height of those mountains and compare. The mountain in middle is higher relative in the two picture- unless that mountain grew that much in such a relatively (geological speaking) short period; it's a picture from a different location.

"The only one i have problems with is the Cape Hattera one.
that's not sea level rise, that's longshore drift in action."

Yeah, that one is laughable. There is so many things wrong it's unworthly to consider: same trick as first two photos- only it's even more obvious. And if anythings it's picture showing erosion, but even for that purpose it's flawed.
With the simple fact the tide changes the apparent sea level and a quick at any tide book will show you the complexity involved with variations in feets by a hourly basis and daily variations, and monthly variations and yearly. And in this time period of a few years, you are actually dealing [which is a very well known fact] with a fraction of a inch in actual sea level rise, it's simply ludicrously inane.