It's a moot point.
It's obvious that there is lake where there was once glacier. The $64,000 question is, is this part of a long pattern, a one-time thing, or what?
This whole "photo" thing is dramatic, but not scientific.
Current Events » in reply to I see the effect you refer to
It's obvious that there is lake where there was once glacier. The $64,000 question is, is this part of a long pattern, a one-time thing, or what?
This whole "photo" thing is dramatic, but not scientific.