The second derivative is small, but non-zero, but not as dramatic as these.
So much for the "exaggerated and alarmist" predictions from the IPCC...
And if you look at actual measurements of sea ice volume (as opposed to area) it gets really scary.
These are from an excellent article on the Big Melt in Scientific American. Highly recommended if you'd rather hear from scientists who are not on Big Oil's payroll.
The article explains why the arctic ice is so sensitive to global warming, and is therefore an ideal "canary in the coal mine" type indicator.
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2012/09/21/arctic-sea-ice-what-why-and-what-next/
Current Events » in reply to No, that chart is not linear since 70. It is quite curved. Hold the edge of an envelope up to it if you don't believe me.
I was trying to give Rob the benefit of a doubt
The whole thread (28 posts)
- C02, "Scary." trend
- The function of that article lies in the headline, not the chart.
- The headline did a good job of boiling down what "James Butler, director of global monitoring at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Earth Science Research Lab in Boulder, Colo." sa…
- No, that chart is not linear since 70. It is quite curved. Hold the edge of an envelope up to it if you don't believe me.
- Curve in name only.
- I was trying to give Rob the benefit of a doubt
- Bad journalism
- It is May 12, 2013 and it is snowing here. How is the weather over there?
- The function of that article lies in the headline, not the chart.
