Nature: Black holes 'do not exist' (?)

et — 4/4/2005 5:39:09 PM (archived)

Black holes are staples of science fiction and many think astronomers have observed them indirectly. But according to a physicist at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, these awesome breaches in space-time do not and indeed cannot exist.

http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050328/full/050328-8.html

The whole thread (16 posts)

Nature: Black holes 'do not exist' (?) - et - 4/4/2005 5:39:09 PM
- Stars with "dark energy" - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/5/2005 4:18:31 AM
  - Pseudoscience. (n/t) - DL - 4/5/2005 1:14:51 PM
    - Pseudopost (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/5/2005 6:57:41 PM
- Sounds like a neat story, but the devil will be in the details, or the maths - Davin :. - 4/4/2005 9:46:52 PM
  - A rose by any other name... - Adam - 4/5/2005 1:10:49 AM
    - The event horizon being a wonderful rug under which to sweep uncertainty.... - DL - 4/5/2005 1:11:41 PM
  - Here's an abstract.... - @'|' - 4/4/2005 10:48:35 PM
- re: Nature: Black holes 'do not exist' (?) - Raoul - 4/4/2005 7:24:56 PM
- time to turn over cosmology again? - phil - 4/4/2005 7:01:55 PM
  - Science is the only area where bloodless revolutions occur...often - R.L. - 4/4/2005 11:41:04 PM
  - Understanding reality is a great adventure, isn't it? - R.L. - 4/4/2005 10:06:51 PM
    - re: Understanding reality is a great adventure, isn't it? - phil - 4/5/2005 6:03:49 PM
    - I'll second that! (n/t) - Fox - 4/4/2005 10:25:30 PM
      - It really is one hell of a game isn't it? - R.L. - 4/5/2005 12:00:48 AM
        
        re: cheat codes... ? - Johannes - 4/5/2005 3:48:20 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (16 posts)