Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to Nature: Black holes 'do not exist' (?)

Sounds like a neat story, but the devil will be in the details, or the maths

Unfortunately Quantum Mech its not an area I'd be able to grok fully, so I'll leave this one to the experts.

Nice move there explaining hawking radiation. Other problems:

1) we have actual photographic observations of Black Holes tearing whole stars apart
2) Radiation bursts of those events
3) Observations of interactions with the orbits of stars.

There is no small amount of hard experimental and astronomical data backing the existence of Hypermasses- the author makes it sound like the theorist is saying that Black Holes are accepted because General Relativity predicts them- tats not the whole story.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (16 posts)