pinto? beans!

Current Events » in reply to More fake news

pinto? beans!

DL — 4/25/2005 1:05:31 AM (archived)

I think you are thinking of the Truck in the 90's, with side-mounted fuel tanks. And even then, they didn't 'blow it up' (as in attach bombs to it.). I'd like to see dcoumentation on the pinto story. If its true, should be easy to come up with....

D

The whole thread (25 posts)

More fake news - phil - 4/24/2005 3:27:38 PM
- No Pinto shenanigans, but they did "help" along the GMC pickups though. (n/t) - Lee - 4/25/2005 1:48:05 AM
- pinto? beans! - DL - 4/25/2005 1:05:31 AM
  - Bombs? No bombs, but they did use incendary devices to cause ignition. - Larry J - 4/25/2005 2:40:20 AM
    - So I should file the claim about the pinto under 'Fake but accurate?' - DL - 4/25/2005 4:00:20 PM
      - re: So I should file the claim about the pinto under 'Fake but accurate?' - p - 4/25/2005 7:55:11 PM
        
        I see... - Davin L. - 4/26/2005 2:40:10 PM
        
        Still waiting. (n/t) - . - 4/28/2005 8:37:23 PM
        
        Still Waiting..... (n/t) - . - 4/27/2005 6:45:28 PM
        
        correction - Davin L. - 4/26/2005 2:41:49 PM
  - re: pinto? beans! - gbaikie - 4/25/2005 2:10:01 AM
- No clucking over the Bushies planting phony news? My, what moral relativity!! - Bowser - 4/24/2005 10:44:58 PM
- Correcting the misinformation that Phil (crusader for truth) posted - R.L. - 4/24/2005 5:57:10 PM
  - re: Correcting the misinformation that Phil (crusader for truth) posted - p - 4/24/2005 6:05:22 PM
    - NO 'MSM' organization 'blew up' a pinto... - R.L. - 4/24/2005 6:16:49 PM
    - You stand corrected on the other points you made up too (n/t) - R.L. - 4/24/2005 6:08:17 PM
      - re: You stand corrected on the other points you made up too - p - 4/24/2005 6:27:26 PM
        
        re: You stand corrected on the other points you made up too - DL - 4/25/2005 1:07:46 AM
        
        no, phil... - R.L. - 4/24/2005 6:52:25 PM
        
        re: no, phil... - p - 4/24/2005 8:19:12 PM
        
        LOL now whos 'reaching'? - R.L. - 4/24/2005 9:24:09 PM
        
        re: LOL now whos 'reaching'? - gbaikie - 4/24/2005 11:43:35 PM
        
        Thinking must be painful for you.... - R.L. - 4/25/2005 4:25:06 AM
        
        I've found the quickest way to sort out an argument like this... - Tom Brosz - 4/24/2005 7:53:33 PM
        
        Good idea! - Tony - 4/25/2005 1:50:33 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (25 posts)