The claim is just fake, then, used to slander what you call the 'main stream media'... not fact checked and vetted before you posted (Google is easy). Thrown out on the digital waters for anyone to later reference (like those much-vaunted self-correcting blogs)- and by referencing end up sounding sourced and well-researched. Funny how that works.
Now, about your other claim- that the BBC hired Hecklers... Is this fake but accurate, fake, or intentionally presented to your reader in a skewed fashion?
I'm just curious how you actually differ from the things you claim to resent about that evil nasty bad bad "main stream media".
How is it that you put it? 'Please try and keep up'
Davin L.
Current Events » in reply to re: So I should file the claim about the pinto under 'Fake but accurate?'
I see...
The whole thread (25 posts)
- More fake news
- No Pinto shenanigans, but they did "help" along the GMC pickups though. (n/t)
- pinto? beans!
- No clucking over the Bushies planting phony news? My, what moral relativity!!
- Correcting the misinformation that Phil (crusader for truth) posted
