If the global warming issue isn't the point, then why is this on space science?

The point is consider the source and the factual filter through which this info flows. A mindlessly biased right wing news source from Canada doesn't cut it as science news.

It's funny. All these folks saying "I disagree" to measurement based studies with little but conjecture and "cause I say so". If there were measurements that could be made to show no human influence on global warming, those also would be published in Science. They're not out there. Old cranks can be your scientific authority if it makes you feel better. That's more what this debate is about, not any ambiguity in the data and the change, albeit subtle, in thermal energy in our biosphere. It's about comfort and some folks need to believe what ever source tells them everything will be alright. I'll stipulate that the SocSec debate is another example of this.