Peiser = some bozo. Looks like this "debate" is over.
Funny how Oreskes isn't a bozo for her initially flawed and consequently falsified research and the Science editorial team isn't a bunch of bozos for admitting their failure during peer review and later publishing a correction. Well, not that funny, just inconsistent.
Yes, the converse can be true, but any "denialists" who said "I now know not to trust anything Oreskes or Science say about global warming" would lack credibility if supposedly they were interested only in facts and adhering strictly to scientific principles of objectivity. Judge each case on its own merits.