Here.

Again, for what it's worth. I have no idea what "independently verified" means in this context, and I would like to see a bit more info on that, but again, that wasn't the point.

My point is that there is a "pro-Kyoto" culture in the scientific community that is steering the arguments. I did some posts a while back on the controversies over the IPCC reports, which submitted summaries to the press that did not jibe with what some of the scientists involved had to say.

This article is typical.

All this person is expressing is uncertainty. But it's in the face of something that is rapidly becoming dogma. What makes this important is that there is considerable political pressure to take actions that would harm the world's most productive economies, and could possibly cause more difficulties for humanity than the global warming would.