The SS-18 uses different engines from the Zenit. Those Zenit engines might be derivatives of the SS-18 engines, but I have not had a chance to research it. If the engines are significantly different, then the rockets are different. The Zenit SL3 uses an RD-171 engine in the first stage. The SS-18 uses the RD264
One key difference is that the SS-18 uses hypergolic propellants, while the Zenit engine uses kerosene/LOX. Doesn't sound at all like the same booster to me.
From the SS-18 Mod 1 (R36m) specs on Encyclopedia Astronautica (with some significant parameters highlighted:
Manufacturer: Yangel. Launches: 145. Failures: 14. Success Rate: 90.34% pct. First Launch Date: 22 October 1971. Last Launch Date: 17 April 1997. Launch data is: incomplete. Liftoff Thrust: 400,000 kgf. Liftoff Thrust: 4,500.00 kN. Total Mass: 209,600 kg. Core Diameter: 3.00 m. Total Length: 33.60 m.</b< Span: 3.05 m. Standard warhead mass: 7,250 kg. Maximum range: 11,200 km. Number Standard Warheads: 1. Standard RV: 15B86. Standard warhead yield: 24,000 KT. Standard warhead CEP: 0 km. Maximum range with alternate warhead: 9,250 km. Number Alternate Warheads: 8. Alternate RV: 15F143U. Alternate warhead yield: 500 KT. Alternate warhead CEP: 0 km. Boost Propulsion: Storable liquid rocket, N2O4/UDMH. Boost engine: RD-264. Cruise Propulsion: Storable liquid rocket, N2O4/UDMH. Cruise engine: RD-0228. Cruise Thrust: 77,000 kgf. Guidance: Inertial.
From the Zenit 3SL page:
Stage Number: 1. 1 x Zenit-1 Gross Mass: 354,300 kg. Empty Mass: 28,600 kg. Thrust (vac): 834,243 kgf. Isp: 337 sec. Burn time: 150 sec. Isp(sl): 311 sec. Diameter: 3.90 m. Span: 3.90 m. Length: 32.90 m. Propellants: Lox/Kerosene No Engines: 1. RD-171 Status: In Production. Comments: Modification of same stage used as strap-on for Energia launch vehicle.
Let's see, it appears the Zenit's first stage has twice the liftoff thrust of the SS-18 Mod 1. The length and diameter are different, too. While it's possible that later models of the SS-18 had different first stage specifications, at least from this comparison it doesn't look like they're the same.
Space/Science » in reply to Actually that might(?) not be true
I don't think so
The whole thread (28 posts)
- Cosmos 1
- re: C'est parti!
- Likethose 12 minutes whne we didn't know if Spirit had made it...
- LOS during rocket burn -- ba-a-a-a-a-ad feelings about this
- Latest website update...
- I think they had trouble with separation on the test flight
- re: I think they had trouble with separation on the test flight
- Russia is claiming a booster failure at 83 seconds
- Does not bode well for Russian SLBM’s (n/t)
- Bummer delux --- Expired ex-Soviet ICBMs can be false economy
- Expensive Probe?
- The Zenit wasn't an ICBM derivative
- depends on payload cost and time constraints
- I agree completely, these should be insured so you know the real cost (n/t)
- Maybe Cosmos II will ride atop a Falcon.
- Russia is claiming a booster failure at 83 seconds
- re: I think they had trouble with separation on the test flight
- LOS during rocket burn -- ba-a-a-a-a-ad feelings about this
- Likethose 12 minutes whne we didn't know if Spirit had made it...
- re: C'est parti!
