Ok, thanks for the information.

Space/Science » in reply to Propellant geometry

Lee — 7/10/2005 7:54:24 PM (archived)

I didn't even think about the whole surface of the cavity being ignited at once. Explains why I'm not a rocket scientist.

The whole thread (20 posts)

Did Griffin steal ideas from the ancient Chinese? - p - 7/8/2005 3:43:43 PM
- He doesn't want to get to orbit on a "firecracker" but doesn't mind living in a balloon? - Lee - 7/8/2005 10:24:21 PM
- re: Big Stick - Raoul - 7/8/2005 5:59:26 PM
- No - the plan is an extension of Goldin's thinking - E.P. Grondine - 7/8/2005 4:59:45 PM
  - The part the ATK plan leaves out: international participation - E.P. Grondine - 7/9/2005 2:11:47 PM
  - Solids - Tom Brosz - 7/9/2005 3:26:38 AM
    - So what about costs and safety for the new space architecture? - Buck Galaxy - 7/11/2005 12:18:07 AM
      - I'll start a new thread - see above (n/t) - Buck Galaxy - 7/11/2005 5:40:36 PM
    - re: Being able to shut off the engine?? - Raoul - 7/9/2005 9:26:36 AM
      - re: Being able to shut off the engine?? - Nick Hoffman - 7/10/2005 6:28:50 AM
        
        Well it is a segmented motor. - Lee - 7/10/2005 7:39:51 AM
        
        re: Well it is a segmented motor. - Delbert - 7/11/2005 3:17:48 PM
        
        re: Well it is a segmented motor. - Larry J - 7/11/2005 5:51:05 PM
        
        Propellant geometry - Larry J - 7/10/2005 5:16:50 PM
        
        re: Propellant geometry - Tom Brosz - 7/11/2005 1:06:04 AM
        
        Bob Truax - Tom Brosz - 7/11/2005 1:25:28 AM
        
        Ok, thanks for the information. - Lee - 7/10/2005 7:54:24 PM
        
        Don't feel bad. I thought the same thing when I started out. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 7/11/2005 1:00:33 AM
      - how - E.P. Grondine - 7/9/2005 1:40:08 PM
    - It's a simple design. - Lee - 7/9/2005 4:16:08 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (20 posts)