I've had entire quotes and articles dismissed because of who wrote them, and not because of what they say. Over time here, I've learned to not print direct links to people on the Left's shitlist, and go beyond them to original material. Same information, but if I link to the wrong site or person, it will be dismissed. One person here will not accept any news out of the Washington Times.
Character and motivation are one HELL of an important factor in judging what someone is saying, why they're saying it, what they may be omitting, and why they haven't said similar things under different conditions.
Expressing concern for CIA personnel because of the Plame outing, while ignoring other similar compromises of CIA operations is a sign that we may be dealing with political motivations, not a real concerned individual.
Kind of like not giving a rat's ass about military deaths in Afghanistan.
Current Events » in reply to Typical
Oh, please.
The whole thread (45 posts)
- Former agents criticize Bush over CIA leak
- re: Former agents
- Typical
- Donald, the "breaking" story is 2 years old. Wake up. (n/t)
- Oh, please.
- There you go ahead
- Ouch!
- re: Former agents
- re: Former agents
- Question for you on the NYT outing
- Bush's dad fire Rove for being a leak before. How things change! (n/t)
- re: Former agents
- Your second sentence reveals the motivations.
- re: Nope! You're wrong it does matter and you don't get.
- Your second sentence reveals the motivations.
- re: Former agents
- Typical
- re: Former agents
