Indeed, SDAITech1. It's a good thing that freedom of the press no longer belongs only to those who own printing presses, or buy ink by the tanker and paper by the forest. It's a lot harder to shut down a thousand annoying little voices than one big one.
But I digress. When the talk turned to parody and satire, I thought of you. It's a tricky thing to pull off without descending into defamation, but I've seen you do it on occasion. Not always, as I'm fond of telling you in regard to your "liberal" impression, but generally you know how to walk that line. You I might trust to do it (albeit with grinding of teeth), but it would scare the bejeezus out of me to see most normal people attempt a parody of Mr. C. Why taunt a snarling beast? That's a job for a trained professional wearing titanium briefs, backed up by his trusty sidekick LaywerMan&tm; brandishing his deadly briefs under the nose of the beast. Or something like that. I'm sure you could spice it up with cameos by Condie and Rummie. Not that I'm trying to incite you to parody, of course, and if you did such a risky think I'd probably want you to post it on your own site so that you get full credit, so to speak, but other than that I'm sure I'd be quite entertained if the spirit of satire just happened to move you. But only if you want to.
Space/Science » in reply to Protected speech often needs 'protection'.
re: Protected speech often needs 'protection'.
The whole thread (17 posts)
- My local NPR station just said NASA to ground all future Shuttle Flights?
