http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8714260/
Why should we? Not only have we not handled the impact hazard, Antartica has more resources than Mars and it is a whole lot closer to home. How much oil is there on Mars, and is there any way to get it here?
You know, I've never done this before, but after reading Zubrin's comment on the station going round in circles, the same stunt Tumlinson has pulled, I have decided that the only way to get the CAPS message out is to go into a full blown attack on manned Mars flight now. (Of course, that's not to say the manned flight to Mars might be good someday in the future, but for now, given you Mars nuts reactions' to the very idea of any money being spent on impact prevention, let's see how this works. This should be fun - they need opposing points for those talking head shows, and it will be a good opportunity to flank you Mars Nuts and Weiler/Morrison and bring CAPS to larger audiences.)
Table of contents
Bookmark
58% oppose spending dime one on sending men to Mars now
The whole thread (36 posts)
- 58% oppose spending dime one on sending men to Mars now
- Try Reading The article
- space polls
- re: space polls
- 40 percent is pretty impressive at this point
- dealing with the impact hazard is left off of every poll
- re: space polls
- It Might Be Worthless, But Fun
- Mark is right: Space polls are worthless
- space polls
- Sounds like dime one will be spent one way or another.
- Try Reading The article
