I wasn't.

Space/Science » in reply to You haven't shown that I wasn't.

I wasn't.

ID — 8/3/2005 1:13:59 AM (archived)

Claiming the data supported a stance of mine. You were. You listed only the data that supported your stance until requested to provide the rest. The data you left out did not support your stance. You may quite honestly have thought them irrelevant, but I don't and don't think it is ever legitimate to blot out available data.

Thanks for being honest enough to post the missing data when requested. I'll try to give you my own conjectures and explain the relevance of the last paragraphs comments when I'm home.

see ya

The whole thread (36 posts)

58% oppose spending dime one on sending men to Mars now - E.P. Grondine - 7/31/2005 6:58:11 PM
- Try Reading The article - Mark Eby - 7/31/2005 7:43:37 PM
  - space polls - Robert - 7/31/2005 8:28:45 PM
    - re: space polls - ken murphy - 8/1/2005 4:26:27 AM
      - Why Did You Leave Out The 99 Data? - Mark Eby - 8/1/2005 12:28:06 PM
        
        I was trying to be nice. - ken murphy - 8/2/2005 12:42:33 AM
        
        Just Try Being Accurate For a Change - ID - 8/2/2005 4:59:11 PM
        
        You haven't shown that I wasn't. - ken murphy - 8/3/2005 12:22:50 AM
        
        Let's Review - Mark Eby - 8/3/2005 12:56:13 PM
        
        I wasn't. - ID - 8/3/2005 1:13:59 AM
        
        re: Another Poll 2003...49% support Manned Mars... - Chris Vancil - 8/2/2005 4:20:15 PM
        
        re: I was trying to be nice. - Chris Vancil - 8/2/2005 6:49:48 AM
        
        re: I was trying to be nice. - ken murphy - 8/3/2005 12:43:18 AM
        
        re: I was trying to be nice. - Chris Vancil - 8/3/2005 8:51:08 AM
        
        Okay, Mark - let's shut down the Moon landings - E.P. Grondine - 8/1/2005 1:53:04 PM
        
        re: Okay, Mark - let's shut down the Moon landings - Doug Ellison - 8/1/2005 2:39:56 PM
        
        We can do all of this far cheaper with unmanned probes - E.P. Grondine - 8/1/2005 2:49:16 PM
        
        re: We can do all of this far cheaper with unmanned probes - Doug Ellison - 8/1/2005 2:57:46 PM
        
        re: We can do all of this far cheaper with unmanned probes - E.P. Grondine - 8/1/2005 6:11:40 PM
        
        re: We can do all of this far cheaper with unmanned probes - Doug Ellison - 8/1/2005 6:43:30 PM
        
        re: We can do all of this far cheaper with unmanned probes - E.P. Grondine - 8/2/2005 12:34:12 AM
        
        re: We can do all of this far cheaper with unmanned probes - Doug Ellison - 8/2/2005 12:02:21 PM
    - 40 percent is pretty impressive at this point - John Q Public - 8/1/2005 3:46:28 AM
    - dealing with the impact hazard is left off of every poll - E.P. Grondine - 7/31/2005 11:40:39 PM
    - re: space polls - gbaikie - 7/31/2005 11:24:28 PM
    - It Might Be Worthless, But Fun - Mark Eby - 7/31/2005 10:54:19 PM
      - ask FrankC for an online poll............. (n/t) - Tony - 8/4/2005 3:28:03 PM
    - Mark is right: Space polls are worthless - Gary - 7/31/2005 10:47:37 PM
      - topline worthless, but trend/comparative data useful - dtb - 8/1/2005 12:39:53 AM
      - Don't like the answers, eh? (n/t) - E.P. Grondine - 7/31/2005 11:41:46 PM
- Sounds like dime one will be spent one way or another. - RobVG - 7/31/2005 7:13:27 PM
  - Yes - E.P. Grondine - 7/31/2005 7:25:41 PM
    - re: Yes - Doug Ellison - 8/1/2005 10:05:10 AM
      - re: Yes - E.P. Grondine - 8/1/2005 1:44:15 PM
        
        re: Yes - Doug Ellison - 8/1/2005 2:41:33 PM
        
        re: Yes - E.P Grondine - 8/4/2005 12:40:37 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (36 posts)