Who in their right mind would order the destruction of such evidence and why? Seriously, what would by gained by such an action 2 years before said attack? Were they covering-up the attack itself or the fact that they were powerless to do anything to stop it? Either way it is real bad folks. I used to work for the military, and I know you can't destroy anything in your files without 1st jumping through hoops: EVERYTHING IS ARCHIVED...EVERYTHING.
And why didn't the "9/11 Investigation" discover anything about this obvious cover-up? Hell, there are even records concerning what records are destroyed and why!
Was the committee conducting the "9/11 Investigation" or its members, themselves part of that cover-up?
For once I agree with you Lindy. (THAT'S FRIGGIN INCREDIBLE!!!)
Current Events » in reply to Mohammed Atta's paper's ordered destroyed by Pentagon official
You may be on to something Lindy.