Same old E.P.

By the way, RL, they're not my theories but those of about 4 teams of upper atmospheric scientists,


WHO? as far as I can tell you haven't referenced them...

and so I'm not really qualified to speak to the issues you raise

Shouldn't you be able to be able to defend your claims? You are making SERIOUS accusations that you are DEMANDING we act on your claims- yet a simple look at the science shows your claims are just silly-

If you make such claims you should at least know the facts!


other than to point our that the same thing has occured following the Columbai grounding as occured following the Challenger grounding, which is pretty much what they predicted.


So what? Statistically Birth rate of a country is inversely proportional to the percapita number of toasters, Global Warming is inversely proportional to the number of pirates in the world...

If you have issues with the chemistry of their theories than you can track them down and raise them with them.

WHO are they, WHERE can I find their work?

I have presented you with data that shows your claim on this is ridiculous... YOU have not presented ANYTHING to back up your claim... the burden of proof is YOURS. You have linked to a news article that had nothing to do with your claim. In fact, the article implies the ozone hole's behavior is linked to reduction of CFC's...

Please excuse me but I don't want to be your martyr here, nor I am sado-masochistic. Please look elsewhere for a victim.

You love to play the martyr, don't you... YOU made the claim, I asked you for proof, you refused to provide it, I provided proof your claims were without any merit... How does that make you a martyr- as I see it You are showing a lack of integrity and your posts on this issue are nothing more than pseudoscience...