I agree. It was wrong.
1) It can't be justified within the original 'manifesto' posted, without broadening the manifesto to mean 'I moderate what i want to when I want to because I want to'
2) Its inconsistent to move the misquote but let the conspiracy ramble stand.
3) The act of moderation insured controversy and, while I have faith that Frank is not biased, it provided ample free ammunition to those who lack that faith.
4) For at least me, who is willing to give Frank the benefit of the doubt about Bias- it requires exercise of that benefit IE, it burns up 'moderator' capital. For example, next time it will be harder to grant the benefit of the doubt, and eventually that benefit will dry up. If it happens enough, I'll be standing right next to Bowser.
It was dumb, Frank. The post shouldn't have been moved. Expecially when there was a post sitting there that SHOULD have been moved.
If Fox agrees with you, I'll tell the same to him. As you know, I'm not fond of 'him too' defenses.
DL
Flame » in reply to This is why, when in doubt, I post on Flame in the first place.
re: I don't think a misquote was enough to move the post
The whole thread (24 posts)
- Those annoying, whiny poor people
- re: A little reality check
- Misquote
