Because he opposes that war, is why. I doubt he opposes it on political grounds, but rather on moral grounds. We had no business starting that war.
Incidentally, he doesn't post Iraqi casualties. He posts American casualties in Iraq.
Let me ask you a different, but related, question: why do you think the Bush Administration has restricted photography of returning military coffins? If I said that that restriction was placed for political reasons, would that annoy you?
Would it make you feel better if all the deaths in all the world were posted daily? Would you believe liberals had principles if we didn't concentrate on one thing at a time but rather scattered our energies so that nothing would get done?
Current Events » in reply to So tell me, why does Robert only post Iraqi casualties?
re: So tell me, why does Donald only post Iraqi casualties?
The whole thread (31 posts)
- can't wait to read the new Clinton Scandle book!
- Maybe you should start with 'Dick and Jane'- It doesn't look like you are ready for big words like 'Scandle' (n/t)
- Buck's Insult deleted (n/t)
- What a load of garbage! (n/t)
- Migawd!
- re: Migawd!
- Thousands upon thousands of nnocent people weren't being killed by Americans.
- And that's really all that matters, right? (n/t)
- Innocent lives lost really is a big deal to liberals. (n/t)
- Only when there's a political advantage to be had. (n/t)
- I see: liberals have no principles. Talk to Tom DeLay lately?
- Only when there's a political advantage to be had. (n/t)
- Innocent lives lost really is a big deal to liberals. (n/t)
- And that's really all that matters, right? (n/t)
- Thousands upon thousands of nnocent people weren't being killed by Americans.
- re: Migawd!
- Yech.
