why do you think the Bush Administration has restricted photography of returning military coffins? If I said that that restriction was placed for political reasons, would that annoy you?
If I said that restriction is far older than the Bush administration, having been instituted in 1991 and upheld by the courts in 1996, would that make one shred of difference to your anti-Bush mythology?
Would it make you feel better if all the deaths in all the world were posted daily? Would you believe liberals had principles if we didn't concentrate on one thing at a time but rather scattered our energies so that nothing would get done?
The nobility of the liberal would sound a lot better if somehow the deaths they focused on around the world weren't just the ones that advanced their political agenda. The point I was making about Donald is that it isn't about dead soldiers. It's about politics.
Current Events » in reply to re: So tell me, why does Donald only post Iraqi casualties?
re: casualties
The whole thread (31 posts)
- can't wait to read the new Clinton Scandle book!
- Maybe you should start with 'Dick and Jane'- It doesn't look like you are ready for big words like 'Scandle' (n/t)
- Buck's Insult deleted (n/t)
- What a load of garbage! (n/t)
- Migawd!
- re: Migawd!
- Thousands upon thousands of nnocent people weren't being killed by Americans.
- And that's really all that matters, right? (n/t)
- Innocent lives lost really is a big deal to liberals. (n/t)
- Only when there's a political advantage to be had. (n/t)
- I see: liberals have no principles. Talk to Tom DeLay lately?
- Only when there's a political advantage to be had. (n/t)
- Innocent lives lost really is a big deal to liberals. (n/t)
- And that's really all that matters, right? (n/t)
- Thousands upon thousands of nnocent people weren't being killed by Americans.
- re: Migawd!
- Yech.