Current Events » in reply to Wrong. It is permissible when non-combattants are permitted to leave.

The whole thread (16 posts)

• Another proud moment for conservatives. - Bowser - 10/15/2005 4:52:15 AM
  • You can't spell slaughter without laughter. (n/t) - Lee - 10/16/2005 7:37:38 PM
  • It is called "siege". It is an old tactic in warfare. - David F Mayer - 10/16/2005 1:44:37 AM
    • It's called "terrorism" when practiced against innocent civilians. (n/t) - Bowser - 10/16/2005 1:56:29 AM
      • So Janet Reno and Bill Clinton were Using terrorism in Waco Texas (n/t) - Scott Evil - 10/17/2005 3:35:23 PM
      • Wrong. It is permissible when non-combattants are permitted to leave. - David F Mayer - 10/16/2005 2:14:48 PM
        • What part of "civilians who could not leave besieged cities and towns for whatever reason should not suffer" don't you get? (n/t) - Bowser - 10/16/2005 5:56:46 PM
        • Permitted vs. enabled - Mary Anne - 10/16/2005 5:56:16 PM
          • "There really isn't enough information in the article..." - Tom Brosz - 10/16/2005 6:43:46 PM
            • I appreciate who is disrupting supplies. - Mary Anne - 10/16/2005 7:41:28 PM
              • re: I appreciate who is disrupting supplies. - Tom Brosz - 10/17/2005 5:40:22 AM
  • Be sure to let us know when our side starts firing the ovens. (n/t) - RobVG - 10/15/2005 8:33:56 PM
    • The not-as-bad-as-Hitler excuse? Haven't heard that lately. (n/t) - alcaray - 10/17/2005 3:37:59 PM
      • That's not what I meant. - RobVG - 10/18/2005 2:17:29 AM
    • It has to be ovens? If it ain't ovens you approve. - Bowser - 10/16/2005 2:04:09 AM
  • They're voting on a constitution while I'm typing this. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/15/2005 7:00:22 AM