It isn't a chemical weapon by international definition
Just because you say "It's a chemical weapon" doesn't make it so. Even more absurdly, you called it a WMD in the subject line of your other post on this thread. Both "chemical weapons" and "weapons of mass destruction" have formal definitions. In no way do white phosphorous weapons - as horrible as they can be - qualify as chemical weapons or WMD under internationally accepted definitions.
You should try to educate yourself on those definitions before you make yourself look even more foolish, although on your case, that's probably a lost cause. When you say drivel like this, it just makes you come across as a moron.