re: Evidence (Tailwind II)

Current Events » in reply to Evidence of US Use of Chemical Weapons on Civilians

re: Evidence (Tailwind II)

Tom Brosz — 11/8/2005 7:36:15 PM (archived)

Sorry, the Left tried this one a year ago. Most of it turned out to be crap. IraqBodyCount, to use a source likely not to look at the low end, puts the Fallujah civilian body count at about 600, not 6,000.

State Department statement on this here.

Of course, the U.S. always lies, while IslamOnLine and the insurgents always tell the truth, so this means nothing, right?

Keep plugging.

The whole thread (28 posts)

Evidence of US Use of Chemical Weapons on Civilians - Jack Herer - 11/8/2005 4:40:38 PM
- Sounds like more anti-American propaganda. - REB - 11/9/2005 3:36:31 PM
  - Sounds like you need to watch the movie - Lindy - 11/9/2005 5:17:57 PM
    - That kid in the still shot is not an Iraq kid. More like a Vietnam kid. - REB - 11/9/2005 5:39:20 PM
      - Agreed - Lindy - 11/10/2005 4:21:40 AM
        
        re: Agreed - REB - 11/10/2005 1:11:12 PM
        
        Thanks for trying - Lindy - 11/10/2005 4:16:21 PM
- More evidence of people who don't know what they are talking about. - David F Mayer - 11/9/2005 12:18:20 AM
  - "Whiskey Pete" IS a chemical weapon - Lindy - 11/9/2005 5:31:54 PM
    - Whilte Phosphorus is NOT among the listed Toxic Chemical Weapons. - David F Mayer - 11/13/2005 12:08:22 AM
    - Lindy, Iraq had stockpiles of these weapons. Think about it. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/9/2005 10:25:17 PM
      - Think about it. - Lindy - 11/10/2005 4:23:21 AM
  - You are probably correct - Alan G. Archer - 11/9/2005 1:24:15 AM
    - re: You are probably correct - Larry J - 11/9/2005 2:08:26 PM
      - Thanks - Alan G. Archer - 11/9/2005 3:19:21 PM
- Funny thing about definitions - Larry J - 11/8/2005 7:49:14 PM
  - Funny thing about WP fired during daytime into civilian populations. - Bowser - 11/8/2005 8:22:15 PM
    - It isn't a chemical weapon by international definition - Larry J - 11/8/2005 8:57:36 PM
      - Diesel fuel, sprayed on civilians, and lit, is a chemical weapon. - Bowser - 11/9/2005 1:39:12 AM
        
        Not by the definition of "chemical weapon" - Larry J - 11/9/2005 2:01:30 PM
        
        It's another load of manure, recycled from a year ago at that. - Tom Brosz - 11/9/2005 2:32:42 AM
        
        Yer old, weak, tired stunt. First ya starve 'em, then torture, then kill. - Bowser - 11/9/2005 2:42:01 AM
- re: Evidence (Tailwind II) - Tom Brosz - 11/8/2005 7:36:15 PM
  - re: Evidence (Tailwind II) - btd - 11/8/2005 8:22:26 PM
  - T. B. "Most of it turned out to be crap." - Bowser - 11/8/2005 8:17:07 PM
    - You know, that technique is getting a bit old. - Tom Brosz - 11/8/2005 9:30:04 PM
      - Tom, did you watch that movie? - Lindy - 11/9/2005 7:31:01 AM
- WMDs, against civilians. Yer tax dollars at work, and for what? (n/t) - Bowser - 11/8/2005 6:41:18 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (28 posts)