Off Topic » in reply to Down to the roaches, I see

The whole thread (41 posts)

• "Harry Potter and the Half-Crazed Bureaucracy" - Tom Brosz - 11/17/2005 7:50:45 AM
  • what's an 'uptick'? - Daniel - 11/17/2005 2:08:12 PM
    • Upticks - Robert - 11/17/2005 7:47:36 PM
      • yeah OK, OK - Daniel - 11/18/2005 2:17:28 AM
      • Someone give Robert something to do! - Tony - 11/17/2005 9:55:34 PM
        • Och, laddie - Robert - 11/18/2005 1:33:53 AM
          • "Kilt tics" Arrrggghhh..... - Tom Brosz - 11/18/2005 2:03:02 AM
            • And the people of Boston *still* don't know how to pronounce it correctly - Fox - 11/18/2005 3:35:06 AM
              • It's a matter of dialect - Robert - 11/18/2005 6:00:08 PM
                • You get high Marx for that one... (n/t) - Fox - 11/18/2005 6:55:26 PM
                  • So, grasshopper... - Robert - 11/18/2005 7:25:18 PM
                    • Ooo, that stings! - Fox - 11/18/2005 8:25:50 PM
                      • LOL - Lindy - 11/20/2005 7:41:34 PM
                        • This Ladybugs me... - :) R.L. - 11/20/2005 11:59:35 PM
                • You should have quit while you were still winning and not lousing. (n/t) - Tony - 11/18/2005 6:16:46 PM
                  • Down to the roaches, I see (n/t) - Robert - 11/18/2005 7:22:34 PM
                    • 15 yard penalty for clipping (n/t) - Fox - 11/18/2005 8:22:58 PM
                      • Segue that toke-n post back to Harry Potter and we'll need to award a Moebius. (n/t) - tony - 11/18/2005 8:55:43 PM
                        • re: Segue that toke-n post back to Harry Potter and we'll need to award a Moebius. - Cy - 11/18/2005 9:38:37 PM
                        • Fire up that goblet, Harry... - Fox - 11/18/2005 9:27:38 PM
                  • Yah, he's guilty of compound och ayes. - alcaray - 11/18/2005 7:15:34 PM
                    • Don't poke a stick into that anthill! (n/t) - Robert - 11/18/2005 7:26:14 PM
                      • Very entertaining ant ticks in this thread! - Mary Anne - 11/18/2005 8:50:49 PM
                        • Ants have ticks? Who knew? Weevil have to investigate further. (n/t) - Tony - 11/18/2005 9:24:30 PM
                          • Yes, weevil! - Fox - 11/18/2005 9:41:27 PM
                            • re: Yes, weevil! - Laurie Street - 11/22/2005 4:55:43 AM
                            • And the moral of the story? - cy - 11/18/2005 9:46:10 PM
                          • Etymology 101 - Cy - 11/18/2005 9:32:57 PM
                            • You mean "entomology", don't you? (n/t) - Fox - 11/18/2005 10:28:29 PM
                              • re: You mean "entomology", don't you? - Cy - 11/19/2005 5:48:07 PM
                              • Release the hounds! {TRUMPET} - ETymologist - 11/19/2005 12:40:30 AM
                                • Had your antennae up for that one, dincha... (n/t) - Fox - 11/19/2005 12:48:11 AM
                        • Ahh, the Queen weighs in! (n/t) - Robert - 11/18/2005 9:12:54 PM
                          • Quick, Henry! The Flit! (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 11/18/2005 11:29:14 PM
                            • Is this thread starting to bug anybody else? - Tom Brosz - 11/19/2005 7:37:39 PM
                              • Ask alcaray - Sam F. - 11/20/2005 1:07:57 PM
                                • (What a dips tick.) - RobVG - 11/20/2005 7:31:02 PM
                                • His post is the only one that answers the question. - Mary Anne - 11/20/2005 4:25:49 PM
                                  • True. - Sam F. - 11/21/2005 4:59:23 AM
                              • It definitely needs debugging. (n/t) - Fox - 11/19/2005 8:25:06 PM
    • re: what's an 'uptick'? - alcaray - 11/17/2005 4:29:09 PM