Off Topic — HabitableZone

Off Topic » in reply to re: Yes I am trying to come to grips with the accepted wisdom and

re: I will agree with the natural philosophy interpretation and

If someone can prove that all of creation does not exist, or that mass and space came into existence without a creator, or even if someone can prove that space and mass have existed forever, (without coming into existence???) then I will agree with the "mythology" interpretation also.

As for the symbols, they have the same value as in mathematical formulas that were created by other people.

To summarize: The electrons, protons, neutrons, photons, quarks, leptons, etc are all made up of two ingredients.
One of those ingredients is commonly known as space and the other is commonly known as density of mass.

The space has a numeric value that can be calculated with the formula u=cm2. The "u" represents the force created by the lack of mass in the square area. (Arbitrarily called potential force)

In other words, any given quantity of mass always has the above mentioned content/combination of mass and space.

The density of mass is always in motion, arbitrarily called kinetic force. The kinetic force 'k' can be calculated with the formula: k= (u/m)/c. Everything in the universe that contains mass in any quantity at all, has the u/m combination integrated into the mass, if the u/m quantity is multiplied by c the result is energy if the u/m quantity is divided by the c the result is k or "kinetic force". Ordinary mass then is a combination of potential and kinetic force.

Einstein was a very intelligent person and was able to decipher the integration of mass and energy through the use of intuition and mathematics.
I took Einstein's theory into account, but followed slightly different route in my search for the truth, and came to the same conclusion as he did.

Perhaps it will take another hundred or more years before the general science community will discover (or accept) the truth about space and mass, but in the meantime, I feel that Mr. Einstein and I have come closest to understanding how the universe is constructed.

I am not claiming to be any smarter than anyone else, I simply invested the time and effort to investigate this particular segment of science and came up with my conclusions.

Hoping for the best for the next hundred years and more.

Cheers

Johannes

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (9 posts)