Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to Why ignore what the NASA IG wrote about Triana?

Who's ignoring it?

1. IG suggested modifying, not killing Triana (although the "virtual Triana" option is an intriguing idea that's been ignored by Republicans, presumably out of Gore-hatred).

2. Ironically, one IG suggestion was to revert it to the educational mission that Gore had suggested.

3. The IG report was also written prior to construction - once constructed, the only savings is launch costs.

4. Commercial Space Act is hardly relevant now, noone could imagine a Shuttle launch at this point.

5. Cong. Nethercutt is a complete hack.

Meanwhile, the Nat'l Academy of Sciences said launching Triana was a good idea.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (13 posts)