Didn't 680,000 die in the US Civil War?

Current Events » in reply to Civil War Looms With 68 Killed in Baghdad

Scott Evil — 3/1/2006 4:10:27 AM (archived)

Or was it more than that?

You know a lot about body counts...Thought you might know the answer.

The whole thread (20 posts)

Civil War Looms With 68 Killed in Baghdad - Donald - 3/1/2006 2:56:43 AM
- re: Civil War Looms With 68 Killed in Baghdad - azstrummer - 3/1/2006 5:03:40 PM
  - A first step - Tom Brosz - 3/1/2006 5:45:45 PM
    - So you're saying Rumsfield blew it? - azstrummer - 3/1/2006 8:42:20 PM
      - "The basic blunder was going in in the first place." - Tom Brosz - 3/2/2006 1:30:42 AM
        
        Looks like we're seeing progress in at least one area - Tony - 3/3/2006 6:33:26 PM
        
        "Keep the sanctions on? How many people was that killing every year?" - R.L. - 3/3/2006 5:06:12 AM
        
        re: sanctions - Tom Brosz - 3/3/2006 8:31:05 PM
        
        re: "The basic blunder was going in in the first place." - azstrummer - 3/2/2006 11:29:37 PM
        
        The entire concept is lost on you. - Tom Brosz - 3/3/2006 3:01:54 AM
        
        Human nature is lost on you - azstrummer - 3/3/2006 3:41:26 PM
        
        re: Human nature is lost on you - Tom Brosz - 3/3/2006 8:27:53 PM
        
        re: Human nature is lost on you - azstrummer - 3/4/2006 7:39:34 AM
        
        re: Human nature is lost on you - Tom Brosz - 3/4/2006 8:36:31 AM
- Actually, the violence is subsiding. - David F Mayer - 3/1/2006 5:00:38 PM
- If this is a real civil war - Tom Brosz - 3/1/2006 3:53:25 PM
- The power of denial - Jack Herer - 3/1/2006 1:59:21 PM
- Excellent News! - Peter Bruener - 3/1/2006 7:54:45 AM
  - Don't thank me - Donald - 3/1/2006 2:03:09 PM
- Didn't 680,000 die in the US Civil War? - Scott Evil - 3/1/2006 4:10:27 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (20 posts)