To accept the premise Donald and others have that we have "wrecked" Iraq one HAS to also accept the premise that Iraq was better off before the war. I don't accept that, and neither do most Iraqis.
It also requires accepting the premise that leaving Saddam and his sons alone with the population of Iraq for the next thirty years would have been better for Iraq.
A perceptual mentality sees all these things as isolated incidents. I'm forcing a look at the whole picture. That picture includes a major upswing in violence that was largely handled by the Iraqis, not the Americans. It includes an attempt to form a government that is not controlled by the Shiite
Does it mean that those people killed in the recent violence--the 1,500 number is crap, by the way--are of no significance? No. It is notable that these casualties are getting about fifty times the press that the mass graves got, or the actual testimony in Saddam's trial, is getting.
As a test, what have you heard in the news about Operation Said?
Current Events » in reply to OK, one MORE time for the ethically retarded
re: OK, one MORE time for the ethically retarded
The whole thread (19 posts)
- Gangs kill freely in Iraq chaos
- Of course, before the war, the hundreds of bodies never made it to the morgues. (n/t)
- Meanwhile: Iraq government talks in disarray
