Space/Science » in reply to re: Solar mystery

The whole thread (21 posts)

• Solar mystery - Adam - 4/7/2006 12:07:36 PM
  • re: Solar mystery - ljk - 4/7/2006 2:32:44 PM
    • It would be unfair for me to call this the BS that it is- but I will do so - R.L. - 4/8/2006 5:22:49 AM
      • thems fightin' words - Adam - 4/8/2006 8:03:53 AM
        • He's got a point, R.L. - Tom Brosz - 4/8/2006 8:50:34 PM
          • Fair enough... - R.L. - 4/8/2006 11:36:11 PM
            • About the nature article- does anyone have access to it? - R.L. - 4/11/2006 5:51:57 AM
              • Ah... no. - Adam - 4/11/2006 9:47:22 PM
                • re: Ah... no. - R.L. - 4/12/2006 9:18:09 PM
                  • Would be quite a coupe if you got them (n/t) - Adam - 4/13/2006 9:44:14 AM
                    • re: Would be quite a coupe if you got them - R.L. - 4/13/2006 7:31:37 PM
                      • If I did invite them would you all treat them with the respect they deserve? (n/t) - R.L. - 4/14/2006 4:40:07 AM
                        • I promise to be good, Unka Bob (n/t) - Adam - 4/14/2006 8:44:09 PM
                • See above (n/t) - R.L. - 4/12/2006 6:49:23 AM
                • By odd coincidence... - R.L. - 4/11/2006 11:15:09 PM
                  • Probably worth the money. - Tom Brosz - 4/14/2006 6:23:48 PM
            • The mistake is... - Adam - 4/11/2006 1:22:07 AM
            • But there was this explosion from... - ljk - 4/9/2006 4:15:22 PM
    • Jeans theory had it backwards - Adam - 4/7/2006 8:59:49 PM
    • Halo objects - SDF - 4/7/2006 3:56:21 PM
      • Mini-halo disruption due to encounters with stars - ljk - 4/7/2006 8:06:11 PM