Or was that just a canned insult? The loco weed comment was intended to be jocular. (and while we are on the subject, my initial comment in this thread "If we have several thousand recent retired generals, then that indeed is a groundswell", was intended to be a subtle and tactful way of calling your attention to something a little whacky in your statistics rendering).

I think, on the other hand, that you have shown a certain amount of ignorance (yeh - tact is gone at this point) about the numbers of generals there are and the number of recent retirees.

You may have the last insult, sir.