No, you can't read

Current Events » in reply to No, you can't count

No, you can't read

Tony — 4/19/2006 3:48:50 PM (archived)

How many recently retired generals are there?
Say over last 5 years.
(a little help - here was al's post - If we have several thousand recent retired generals

P.S. If you don't hear much about the couple of generals who support Rumsfeld, you're not reading in the right places.
Like NYT, WaPo, Phila Inky......

The whole thread (13 posts)

Death knell for Rummy - Laurie Street - 4/14/2006 8:00:03 PM
- can't tell from the missing link - Tony - 4/14/2006 8:24:32 PM
  - re: The generals - Raoul - 4/14/2006 8:27:53 PM
    - re: The generals - Larry J - 4/17/2006 7:16:12 PM
      - If we have several thousand recent retired generals, then that indeed is a groundswell (n/t) - alcaray - 4/17/2006 10:38:15 PM
        
        Since when is 6 out of several thousand considered a groundswell - Larry J - 4/18/2006 6:21:46 PM
        
        You are deliberately misleading - alcaray - 4/18/2006 9:54:56 PM
        
        No, you can't count - Larry J - 4/19/2006 2:17:22 PM
        
        Thousands of retired generals who served under Rumsfeld during Iraq II? - alcaray - 4/19/2006 4:02:03 PM
        
        Of those 6 or 8 retired generals, how many retired recently? - Larry J - 4/19/2006 5:49:03 PM
        
        Can you come up with an example of my military ignorance from this thread? - alcaray - 4/19/2006 6:39:28 PM
        
        several hundred recently retired? - Tony - 4/19/2006 6:23:18 PM
        
        No, you can't read - Tony - 4/19/2006 3:48:50 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (13 posts)