"We said that napalm had been used, because napalm is a bomb which is a fuel bomb that burns only on the exposed part of the body, so that the clothes will not be affected,"

Current Events » in reply to Iraq doctor brings evidence of US napalm use on civilians at Fallujah

David F Mayer — 5/24/2006 1:43:54 PM (archived)

What in the heck is that supposed to mean? Napalm does not burn clothing? Napalm does not burn through clothing? Both are absurd.

The whole thread (14 posts)

Iraq doctor brings evidence of US napalm use on civilians at Fallujah - Jack Herer - 5/23/2006 5:32:21 PM
- "We said that napalm had been used, because napalm is a bomb which is a fuel bomb that burns only on the exposed part of the body, so that the clothes will not be affected," - David F Mayer - 5/24/2006 1:43:54 PM
  - Language barrier - Jack Herer - 5/24/2006 5:00:06 PM
  - "Both are absurd" - Lindy - 5/24/2006 2:41:16 PM
- Corroborating sources - Robert - 5/23/2006 11:26:11 PM
  - re: Corroborating sources - Tom Brosz - 5/24/2006 12:06:24 AM
- re: Iraq doctor brings evidence of US napalm use on civilians at Fallujah - ER - 5/23/2006 6:17:52 PM
  - You can kind of see what we're up against on this board. - Tom Brosz - 5/23/2006 9:06:12 PM
    - Right. Ever see a flame thrower in use with modern incendiary fluids? - David F Mayer - 5/25/2006 5:32:22 PM
    - re: You can kind of see what we're up against on this board. - dtb - 5/24/2006 12:20:05 AM
    - Minds of the highest caliber infest this board - Alan G. Archer - 5/23/2006 11:24:33 PM
    - and Napalm is "wind" born? strange way to put it. slows it a little, on the way down, I guess. - alcaray - 5/23/2006 10:11:32 PM
    - Yeah, people like you. - Lindy - 5/23/2006 9:22:06 PM
  - re: Iraq doctor brings evidence of US napalm use on civilians at Fallujah - gbaikie - 5/23/2006 7:35:08 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (14 posts)