re: Is there any point to this?

Flame » in reply to re: Is there any point to this?

re: Is there any point to this?

R.L. — 6/16/2006 1:32:33 AM (archived)

Where did I say that RL's work was wrong?

Ummm, in just about every post you have made in this thread?

I very clearly "translated" that:

their calculations do not give the same results as the "measured" observations.

Well DUH! The point was that the already existing theory was insufficient- we did not come up with the theory, we were evaluating it and learning from how it failed- heck even if I advocated a theory that was wrong I would accept the facts if proven wrong... I am not that wrapped up in it-

Now RL is trying to change his story by saying:
There was an unexplained feature in the data,
In other words, he was clueless.

Yeah, we were clueless, except for the science that was guiding us- but we did real science to reveal the clues and the truth- THAT is what science is about- why the hell would you investigate something when you 'knew' the answer? Your problem is that you think your fantasies count as research- they dont.... REAL research involves falling in love with some ideas and then having to discard them when proof contradicts them. AGAIN we were collecting data and looking at which theories supported the data...

Oh hell, you are too stupid to even understand that simplified version- screw it- you are an idiot- show us your papers, show us the difference that you have made- let me see your peer reviewed papers, let us see that you matter even a little bit in the sciences... prove that you have more to offer than asinine posts on a public board...

The whole thread (66 posts)

"Lindy has shown herself to be a jew hating homophobe many times" - Lindy - 6/12/2006 2:41:39 AM
- Where am I wrong? - R.L. - 6/12/2006 3:12:59 AM
  - At this point, you'd better come up with some serious example links. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 6/12/2006 6:53:11 PM
    - see this thread - R.L. - 6/12/2006 7:55:16 PM
      - Gawd RL, you are boorish - Lindy - 6/12/2006 8:58:55 PM
        
        Weighing in, why I don't know - Tony - 6/12/2006 9:15:50 PM
        
        Because it needs to be said, and you have the words. - Mary Anne - 6/13/2006 1:38:46 AM
      - re: see this thread - R.L. - 6/12/2006 8:27:25 PM
      - re: see this thread - R.L. - 6/12/2006 8:24:55 PM
      - re: see this thread - R.L. - 6/12/2006 8:15:53 PM
      - re: see this thread - R.L. - 6/12/2006 8:13:14 PM
      - re: see this thread - R.L. - 6/12/2006 8:00:20 PM
        
        please - - D. - 6/12/2006 8:40:34 PM
        
        Ironic... - Tom Brosz - 6/12/2006 10:54:38 PM
        
        How about Ken Bigley? - Daniel - 6/14/2006 6:53:03 PM
        
        YUP... - R.L. - 6/13/2006 1:28:32 AM
      - re: see this thread - R.L. - 6/12/2006 7:58:37 PM
  - re: Where am I wrong? - Lindy - 6/12/2006 3:16:15 AM
    - re: Hey Lindy - Johannes - 6/12/2006 8:29:02 PM
      - Start here: - R.L. - 6/12/2006 9:44:52 PM
      - re: Hey Lindy - R.L. - 6/12/2006 8:56:15 PM
      - re: Hey Lindy - R.L. - 6/12/2006 8:54:10 PM
        
        "only you and lindy are stupid enough to fall for it..." - Lindy - 6/12/2006 9:01:41 PM
        
        re: OK, he's on the defensive. - Johannes - 6/12/2006 11:46:32 PM
        
        You are the one defending a thesis. - podrock - 6/16/2006 11:01:14 PM
        
        re: You are the one defending a thesis. - Johannes - 6/17/2006 4:51:03 PM
        
        I try to limit the number of walls I'll beat my head against. - podrock - 6/17/2006 5:07:54 PM
        
        re: Sorry I don't recall - Johannes - 6/17/2006 8:14:02 PM
        
        Nope, you are doing a fine job of shooting yourself in the foot... - R.L. - 6/13/2006 12:17:57 AM
        
        re: I think I get it - Johannes - 6/13/2006 3:29:56 AM
        
        You are plumbing hitherto unseen depths of obtuseness. - Tony - 6/13/2006 2:00:06 PM
        
        re: Are you looking for a flame? - Johannes - 6/13/2006 7:41:34 PM
        
        Not really. - Tony - 6/14/2006 5:03:05 PM
        
        Ahhh, yes grasshopper... - R.L. - 6/15/2006 11:52:14 PM
        
        re: Notice how the Master speaks to the student. (n/t) - Johannes - 6/16/2006 2:10:33 AM
        
        re: How about slight criticism then? - Johannes - 6/15/2006 1:45:13 AM
        
        " Each atom of U235 gives off an approximate equivalent of 1W second of power." - R.L. - 6/16/2006 4:55:32 PM
        
        re: " Each atom of U235 gives off an approximate equivalent of 1W second of power." - R.L. - 6/16/2006 5:11:43 PM
        
        re: " Each atom of U235 gives off an approximate equivalent of 1W second of power." - Johannes - 6/17/2006 2:51:00 AM
        
        :) Please explain to us .... - R.L. - 6/17/2006 3:52:24 AM
        
        Yes, you moron.... - R.L. - 6/17/2006 3:08:21 AM
        
        re: Yes, you moron.... - Johannes - 6/18/2006 4:28:39 AM
        
        Notice that Johannes is too cowardly to admit he was incredibly wrong.... (n/t) - R.L. - 6/17/2006 1:21:01 AM
        
        Is there any point to this? - Tony - 6/15/2006 2:37:18 PM
        
        re: Is there any point to this? - Johannes - 6/16/2006 12:49:59 AM
        
        "Where did I say that RL's work was wrong? " - Tony - 6/16/2006 1:42:33 PM
        
        re: "Where did I say that RL's work was wrong? " - Johannes - 6/16/2006 11:26:53 PM
        
        re: Is there any point to this? - R.L. - 6/16/2006 1:32:33 AM
        
        Well, he does have the "falling in love with some ideas" part down pat. (n/t) - alcaray - 6/16/2006 6:25:29 PM
        
        YUP, but that is the part that takes no work or education - R.L. - 6/16/2006 7:13:41 PM
        
        re: Is there any point to this? - Johannes - 6/16/2006 2:56:36 AM
        
        I mean, really...IS there any point to this? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 6/16/2006 5:05:27 AM
        
        re: Yes Tom - Johannes - 6/17/2006 5:19:33 AM
        
        I think you called it Johannes - Noteworthy - 6/17/2006 3:58:11 PM
        
        No, but your lifes work is useless.... - R.L. - 6/16/2006 7:20:19 AM
        
        re: The shoe is in the other foot; no? - Johannes - 6/17/2006 12:00:21 AM
        
        You have done no work... - R.L. - 6/17/2006 1:17:02 AM
        
        re:Prove that e=(u/k)c is wrong. (n/t) - Johannes - 6/17/2006 8:20:12 PM
        
        I was referring to the thread - Tom Brosz - 6/16/2006 6:55:39 PM
        
        Not really... - R.L. - 6/15/2006 9:29:16 PM
        
        LOL- nope - R.L. - 6/13/2006 4:11:59 AM
        
        re: It's your choice..... - Johannes - 6/13/2006 7:26:17 PM
        
        I don't think I EVER even commented on your album page - R.L. - 6/12/2006 11:16:28 PM
    - re: Where am I wrong? - R.L. - 6/12/2006 7:02:04 AM
    - You are guilty.... - R.L. - 6/12/2006 5:44:00 AM
    - Where did I lie? - R.L. - 6/12/2006 4:20:36 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (66 posts)