Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to Nobody's mentioned any downsides

They're new and experimental

Hi SDF

Two things mean they're under-invested in.

(1) Uranium mining industry would be gutted by reactors that don't need anymore ore mined for decades. There's enough 'waste' to last for decades.

(2) Water-cooled enriched uranium reactors are 'good enough' and building them has become commercially viable.

Both mean that Governments have been reluctant to pursue thorium and fast reactors with R & D funding - except in places like India with scads of thorium and not a lot of uranium.

Adam

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (13 posts)