"There is zero evidence for any of this" You don't get it.
The point Novak correctly makes, and I think he has some authority to speak to this since he's the guy that supposedly was leaked to, is that the other side is the one that needs to have evidence to make its point. "There is zero evidence that a crime was not committed" is a meaningless statement.
This case was done in November when there were zero indictments for the actual crime of outing a covert agent. You can hang on until 2008 waiting for the other shoe to drop, but it's probably going to get pretty old by then.