I originally meant to include Mir along with the Apollo example, but as you point out, Mir's value was primarily to manned exploration issues, not to any other scientific or industrial application. Mir was indeed a success, it's crew managed to deal with events no robot could handle, breakdowns, collisions, even a fire! They also demonstrated that human versatility, determination and heroism is what all exploration is about. I was sad to see it shut down, I had hoped it could be maintained in some sort of maintenance mode, as backup or complement to ISS, but I suppose the benefits of redundancy were trumped by the drawbacks of duplicated effort.
Space/Science » in reply to re: "Yield to the logic of the situation"--LCDR Spock (UFP-SF)
I agree.
The whole thread (29 posts)
- Is man in space scientifically useless?
- "Yield to the logic of the situation"--LCDR Spock (UFP-SF)
- There is more to life than Science.
- There's not much of a story if there's no one to peer and twiddle. (n/t)
- Currently 99% of effort with manned space is on survival not science
- re: Is man in space scientifically useless?
- re: Is man in space scientifically useless?
- Ask the people studying the hundreds of pounds of Moon rocks brought back by Apollo
