Santorum, sham, same difference.

Current Events » in reply to Santorum putting up a sham Green campaign

Fox — 8/1/2006 11:29:54 PM (archived)

Any of you guys the slightest bit embarrassed about this?

If I were a Pennsylvanian Green, I would be. I might even demand to have my signature removed, if that sort of thing is possible.

But: are any of the rest of us surprised about this? Sadly, not I. And it causes me to ponder briefly about Nader's funding in 2004...

The whole thread (16 posts)

Santorum putting up a sham Green campaign - alcaray - 8/1/2006 9:22:39 PM
- Money doesn't talk, it swears. - ER - 8/2/2006 7:08:39 PM
- It is a sham, but so is what the Dems are doing in Texas. - Lee - 8/2/2006 4:06:48 AM
  - lot of Dems in Texas doing a lot of things. What are you talking about? (n/t) - alcaray - 8/2/2006 2:17:19 PM
    - About keeping Delay's name on the ballot. - Lee - 8/2/2006 6:49:24 PM
      - Ahh. I don't think you understand what is going on. - alcaray - 8/2/2006 8:35:40 PM
        
        A blast from the past... - Tom Brosz - 8/3/2006 5:21:16 AM
        
        Oy, do I have to explain what an editorial is again? - alcaray - 8/3/2006 2:54:33 PM
        
        Nice try. - Tom Brosz - 8/3/2006 4:10:03 PM
        
        I'm not clear: I thought the target of your post and the piece you linked to was the newspaper? - alcaray - 8/3/2006 4:31:06 PM
- Santorum, sham, same difference. - Fox - 8/1/2006 11:29:54 PM
  - Anyone should be allowed to run. - Mary Anne - 8/2/2006 1:08:20 AM
    - Should the Democrats put up Nazis and conservative independents? - alcaray - 8/2/2006 2:23:45 PM
      - Not necessarily. - Mary Anne - 8/2/2006 11:43:59 PM
      - are you saying Nazis and conservative independents are the same thing? - Publius - 8/2/2006 6:35:13 PM
        
        Obviously, "Nazis" is the incendiary part of my statement... - alcaray - 8/2/2006 8:45:57 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (16 posts)