re: Binoculars

Space/Science » in reply to Sorry, Raoul...I misunderstood your post at first.

re: Binoculars

Raoul — 8/11/2006 7:20:24 PM (archived)

I had my 20x80 Swift binoculars....And I don't remember if it was visible with the naked eye, that flash...I don't think so.
It must have been 10 years ago when Hale Bopp became visible but only through binoculars

The whole thread (19 posts)

Not anomalism... - ER - 8/11/2006 5:43:26 PM
- Report your sighting at the National UFO Reporting Center - Eric - 8/12/2006 9:54:01 PM
- re: Not anomalism... - Raoul - 8/11/2006 6:27:48 PM
  - re: Not anomalism... - ER - 8/11/2006 6:49:25 PM
    - Sorry, Raoul...I misunderstood your post at first. - ER - 8/11/2006 7:04:48 PM
      - re: Binoculars - Raoul - 8/11/2006 7:20:24 PM
    - re: :-) - Raoul - 8/11/2006 7:01:03 PM
- UFO means Unidentified Flying Object, not Aliens - REB - 8/11/2006 6:10:57 PM
  - re: UFO means Unidentified Flying Object, not Aliens - ER - 8/11/2006 6:55:17 PM
- Yes, similar experiences - McFly - 8/11/2006 6:02:41 PM
  - re: Yes, similar experiences - Fox - 8/12/2006 12:13:38 AM
  - re: Yes, similar experiences - ER - 8/11/2006 6:53:57 PM
    - The Lubbock Lights - LJK - 8/11/2006 7:34:54 PM
      - re: The Phoenix Lights - Peter Bruener - 8/12/2006 7:09:17 AM
      - re: The Lubbock Lights - ER - 8/11/2006 7:49:37 PM
        
        re: The Lubbock Lights - LJK - 8/11/2006 8:21:52 PM
        
        Not at 30-40k feet. (n/t) - ER - 8/11/2006 8:30:26 PM
        
        1951? - Peter Bruener - 8/12/2006 8:22:48 AM
        
        You got me there! (n/t) - ER - 8/12/2006 11:35:13 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (19 posts)